One of the leading apologists for the professors wrote in last week to say how she was unconvinced by my claims to have caught the professors out in numerous lies. The irony is that she unwittingly betrays herself by showing that she herself knows that they were lying.
Ms. Redboots claimed that after reviewing two days of court testimony, she concludes that the Bushes did nothing worse ("nothing more nefarious", she says) than try to evade service of court documents. But if she believes that's what they did, then she knows that they were lying about the home invasion.
Nothing more nefarious? There is indeed something worse than trying to avoid service of documents, Ms. Redboots. And that's lying about it to get someone else thrown in jail.
And I'd say that refusing to admit that while holding yourself up as an objective arbiter of proper conduct makes you a bit of a hypocrite.